logo
header-pic
The 2030 Insurance Agency: Where Humans and Machines Build Revenue Together
Educational
author-pic
Dana Coates
Strategic Partnerships

Image (1).png

The Baseline: 2025 Human Layer Benchmark

• $250,000 in commission revenue per employee is the commonly accepted benchmark today.

• This is based on a largely human-driven process across service, sales, and admin, with varying degrees of automation layered on top (email templates, CRM reminders, policy download, etc.).

• Most agencies that hit this benchmark have some automation and tech support, but still rely heavily on people to move things across the finish line.

Enter 2030: Human + Machine Collaboration


By 2030, we expect:

• Significantly increased tech enablement: AI bots handling quote preparation, submission writing, follow-up scheduling, renewal processing, and perhaps even coverage comparisons and customer education.

• Human roles evolving into strategic, creative, and emotional intelligence roles: nurturing relationships, spotting coverage gaps creatively, solving complex problems, and mentoring less experienced staff or clients.


This means:

• Fewer humans can do much more.

• The value per human should increase — not just in production capacity, but in strategic output.

• But just as important, the “non-human layer” (bots, systems, and AI workflows) will now be producing tangible value and cost savings too — and that should be factored in.




Projected Math for 2030 (Assuming AI Adoption Matures)


Let’s say:

• Each human role becomes 2x more productive through automation. (This is conservative.)

• That means the benchmark would shift from $250,000 to at least $500,000 per human layer in commission revenue.

• Some agency models, particularly those investing heavily in smart automation and reducing friction, might see this climb to $600,000–$750,000 per human, particularly in commercial lines and complex personal lines.

• Agencies that don’t evolve will fall behind in per-head revenue, not because the team is lazy or less skilled — but because they’re competing against augmented humans who are working with a fleet of bots behind them.




What About the Bots?


Just like we budget for AMS licenses, E&O, and staff, we’ll soon:

• Budget for AI agents, workflow bots, and knowledge systems.

• Assign a “virtual FTE value” to each bot or AI-enabled process.

• For example, if a quoting bot replaces 40% of an assistant’s time, you might treat that bot as worth $100,000 of revenue capacity, just like you would a junior account manager.




Summary:

• 2025 Benchmark: $250,000 per human layer

• 2030 Benchmark: $500,000–$750,000 per human layer (depending on AI leverage and complexity of business)

• Virtual layer contribution: Quantified based on task replacement or acceleration, possibly contributing the equivalent of 1–2 FTEs worth of output per agency





The big takeaway? The real value of humans in 2030 will be based on emotional intelligence, problem-solving, trust, and strategic creativity — not just transactional processing. Bots will do the grunt work, but they can’t replace the nuance of a truly skilled agent, advisor, or account manager.